home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: fido.asd.sgi.com!austern
- From: Rich Paul <linguist@cyberspy.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: STL/String naming scheme confusion
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 09:37:56 PDT
- Organization: Technical Resource Connection
- Approved: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com
- Message-ID: <3172555D.44D0@cyberspy.com>
- References: <199604120728.JAA01452@bredex.bredex.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: isolde.mti.sgi.com
- X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 09:55:41 -0400
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (WinNT; I)
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBVAwUBMXJ7ZUy4NqrwXLNJAQFdtgH+LNqznGZnvC1Cgki6YY1CmTm52jtkiVbx
- tPEEjLANp8mzqUFeVP0V0d283U9r335B0vnlGIttok2V3xRRjcqxpw==
- =xlsB
- Originator: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com
-
- Nico Josuttis wrote:
- > Why don't we use the string naming scheme ?
- > - Why is search() not also called find() ?
- > - Why is find_end() not called rfind() ?
- >
- > (I guess the missing algorithms do miss because
- > reverse iterators do the job)
- >
-
- Without judging which one is better, I'd be quite inclined to
- agree that a single naming scheme would be much nicer to deal
- with!
-
-
- --
- #include <legalbs/standarddisclaimer>
- Rich Paul | If you like what I say, tell my
- C++, OOD, OOA, OOP, | employer, but if you don't,
- OOPs, I forgot one ... | don't blame them. ;->
- ---
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: Try just posting with your
- newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
- comp.std.c++ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html
- Moderation policy: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/policy.html
- Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu
- ]
-